by Deb McInnes, Australia
What I find interesting in this case is that by going directly to the media, there has been no one investigating the small group of disgruntled ‘whistle-blowers’, who they are, nor even their intentions to ascertain if they are in fact or could be vindictive or malicious by nature. The media has taken the lie and ran with it. This level of corruption would be very difficult to get away with in any reputable organisation. How can this be?
It is common practise and a well known fact in any Company or Business that of the ‘whistle blowing policy’ … where an individual comes forth to report suspected wrongdoing, malpractice, corruption and so forth in a company. The complaint of the whistle-blower is investigated by the company as to its intention and if it is without malice before ever acting upon it. If it is seen to be discriminatory and malicious the individual (whistle-blower) reporting receives disciplinary action in line with the company’s particular policy on this.
- How can a group raising allegations towards Universal Medicine and Serge Benhayon NOT be investigated to ascertain if what they are revealing is true or is in fact malicious in nature?
- How can the person and company accused of such allegations not be investigated and interviewed in fair response to these allegations to ascertain if the allegations are in fact true or not before being publicly outed and disgraced?
- How can facts be overlooked and true responses to allegations be denied in favour of an non-investigated source (the whistle-blowers).
That this can be allowed to happen to any individual or company should be of great concern to us all in society.